|
Late last fall, dozens of researchers, two ships, and an instrumented aircraft traveled to Tasmania. They were attracted not by the island's rugged beauty, unique wildlife, and moderate climate, but by its distance from Northern Hemisphere sources of pollution. Their aim was to study the background or natural levels of various atmospheric aerosols in the remote marine atmosphere.
Here is Huebert's preliminary report on how the project went.
My impression is that ACE-1 was highly successful. We managed to get good flights in for virtually all of our major objectives, including the long transects down the Pacific, vertical profiles in many remote marine locations, studies of the Kilauea volcano plume, local and vertical column closure, aerosol production by clouds, Lagrangian aerosol evolution (in which we repeatedly sampled the same air mass as it moved), air-sea flux measurements, vertical profiles over the Disco and the Cape Grim measurement site (see photo), and intercomparisons with instruments on the other platforms.
The C-130 was as solid as a rock. We had two down days to do an engine change, but in 295 flight hours no other flight was delayed or cancelled because of the aircraft! We had been worried that the noise and vibration of the aircraft would so fatigue the scientific party that their performance might suffer, but that turned out not to be much of a problem. Atmospheric chemistry packages are all pumps and noisemakers anyway, so this wasn't all that big a degradation from chemistry experiments on other aircraft. Three successive days of nine-hour flights, on the other hand, is enough to send anybody to bed for a day. It was important that we had duplicate scientific crews in addition to the double air crews, so fresh people were flying each day. We received excellent support from NCAR's Research Aviation Facility and UOP's Joint International Climate Projects/Planning Office and Office of Field Project Support.
Our first Lagrangian try washed out when both the forecast and the balloon-data receiver were busted, but the next two worked great. We completed two three-flight Lagrangian experiments, the second one starting in clear, sunny air. For that one we had also done a pre-Lagrangian flight, in which we tried to characterize the source of the postfrontal air we would be studying the following two days. Disco then launched three balloons, all of which we followed for three flights. Interestingly, they maintained almost exactly the same orientation relative to one another, even though the wind speeded up and turned a 90-degree corner midway through the experiment. Cloudiness increased during both Lagrangians, and we have preliminary evidence that this changed the aerosol size spectra in sensible ways.With the exception of the LIF ammonia instrument, which was being built and tested as we departed Jeffco [NCAR's aviation facility at Jefferson County Airport in Colorado], we rarely had an instrument down for a whole flight--pretty amazing! We had a number of close calls, when repair parts or expendables couldn't get through customs, but we managed to keep things working nonetheless. Midway through the Hobart deployment the ammonia system came on line, and we got very enlightening data from it the remainder of the experiment.
Among the most obvious results to emerge so far is the production of new aerosol nuclei in the outflow from cumulus clouds. Peter Hobbs [University of Washington] has noted this phenomenon before, but we were able to sample it with measurements of sulfuric acid and ammonia vapors (the substances that condense to make the new nuclei) and several complementary techniques for examining the ultrafine nuclei that were being produced. We traced thin, free-tropospheric layers of fine particles back to the air detraining from fields of cumulus clouds and were able to distinguish between productive and nonproductive conditions.
The Cape Grim and Disco experiments also went well, each with their highlights. So early indications are that the experiment was a huge success. Of course, the real proof will come when we have all the quality-controlled data in hand so we can do closure calculations and see how well the platforms intercompared. Much of that science will take several years to sort out. But the early indication is that we did exactly what we set out to do.