Climate affairs
hits the scene with new book, academic programs
by David Hosansky
If
universities offer multidisciplinary programs in marine affairs, wonders
NCAR senior scientist Mickey Glantz, why not a course of study for students
interested in climate affairs? The atmosphere is important to the well-being
of societies, as are the oceans, and it requires the attention not only
of physical scientists, but also economists, ecologists, geographers,
lawyers, political scientists, and policymakers, among others. Such
a multidisciplinary approach is important for making climate science
usable to policymakers, Glantz believes.
Climate-society-environment interplay is too important to be
left to the climatologist or, for that matter, to any single set of
discipline-focused researchers, contends Glantz, a member of the
NCAR Environmental and Societal Impacts Group (ESIG) since the early
1970s.
Hes detailed his vision in a new primer, Climate Affairs, published
by Island Press. The wide-ranging book draws on atmospheric science,
history, international law, and other disciplines to illustrate how
climate influences virtually all aspects of society. It makes a powerful
case for policymakers to take climate into account when making decisions,
lest they face unwelcome repercussions from nature.
In the ensuing decades of the twenty-first century, the ability
of societies around the globe to cope with climate variability, weather
extremes, and the likelihood of global warming and its unknown beneficial
as well as adverse effects will increasingly be tested and will likely
dominate the decision-making concerns of national leaders, Glantz
writes in the book. In this regard, it seems that the twenty-first
century has a good chance of becoming the climate century,
a century in which climate- related concerns will occupy significant
attention of the next generations of policymakers.
Defining a discipline
A climate affairs program, Glantz says, should focus on six climate
areas: science, impacts on ecosystems and societies, policy and law,
politics, economics, and ethics and equity. Topics would include understanding
the physical climate system and accepting human activities as a part
of that system, evaluating environmental regulations, interpreting the
competing agendas of policymakers and private interest groups, looking
into the impact of climate variations on a societys well-being,
and exploring such ethical issues as whether countries with a climate
favorable to agriculture have a responsibility to help those with a
less favorable climate.
Satellite picture of 2002 fires and haze on the island of Borneo.
The red dots represent fire locations. (From Visible Earth, Jacques
Descloitres, MODIS Land Rapid Response Team, NASA/GSFC, 19 August
2002.)
Why encourage a multidisciplinary approach to climate? At a time of
concern about climate change, Glantz says it is particularly important
for physical scientists, social scientists, government leaders, and
others to join forces if the international community is to formulate
a unified approach to protecting the atmosphere. Just as nations had
formulated the Law of the Sea by the 1980s to govern such oceanic issues
as marine pollution and deep seabed mining, experts now are floating
the idea of drawing up a law of the atmosphere that would cover air
pollution, land use, and other activities that can affect climate.
The concept of a climate affairs course of study has stirred considerable
interest overseas. The Asian Institute of Technology in Bangkok is creating
a climate affairs program, and universities and governmental organizations
in China, Japan, and Malaysia, including the United Nations University
in Tokyo, also are developing climate affairs classes. Columbia University
is pursuing the possibility of establishing a climate affairs program
at the masters level.
In addition, Shannon McNeeley (ESIG) is helping to set up a climate
affairs education and outreach program with the Alaska Native Science
Commission and the University of Alaska. It will focus on the impacts
of climate and environmental changes in the state, with a particular
focus on Alaska Natives.
Glantz says one of his goals is to make students, educators, and policymakers
more aware of the impacts of climate. As he writes in his book, The
field of climate affairs was developed in a conscious attempt to put
climate and climate-related factors on the list of items that decision
makers normally take into consideration. . . . The goal is to make them
aware of such influences so that in the face of future anomalies they
have the option to pursue proactive strategies and not just rely on
reactive ones.