UCAR > Communications > UCAR Quarterly > Fall 2000 Search


Fall 2000

Model sheds new light on solar cycle

by Carol Rasmussen

A new model has pinned down the explanations of some of the solar cycle's curious characteristics: intense cycles are short and weak cycles long, and strong and weak cycles alternate in a manner that's not random. The model, developed by Paul Charbonneau and Mausumi Dikpati of NCAR's High Altitude Observatory (HAO), is an updated version of a type of solar dynamo model that fell out of favor some 30 years ago. Their results appear in the October Astrophysical Journal.

Solar cycles vary from 9 to 14 years in length. Over time, however, they never departs from the 11-year average cycle length for more than a couple of cycles—much less than a random series would. "It's been said that the sun has a clock and the clock is always adjusted," says Dikpati. She and Charbonneau are the first to succeed in simulating this behavior.

The cycles are caused by changes in the sun's magnetic fields, whose behavior is far more complex than that of the earth. A large-scale, toroidal (doughnut-shaped) magnetic field wraps around the sun's rotational axis like a belt, with the inside edge of the doughnut extending into the solar interior. "The toroidal field is easy to observe," says Charbonneau. "You can see it by looking at sunspots." This field reverses polarity about once every 11 years. The Sun also has a weaker, poloidal (bar-magnet- shaped) field—the same shape as the earth's magnetic field—which also flips poles every 11 years. This field is usually inferred from structures in the solar corona rather than measured directly, which is hard to do from the earth's viewing angle.

The theory on why these two fields switch back and forth in sync, Charbonneau explains, is that the poloidal field is transformed into a toroidal field, which then turns back into a poloidal one of the opposite polarity, and so on. Modelers have long been able to reproduce the transformation of a poloidal to a toroidal field. "It's not that hard to model the Sun's fluid center and shear regions," says Charbonneau. "If you shove a magnetic field in [the model], it behaves like a Slinky"—the north-south field gets stretched further and further until it wraps around the rotational axis.

The hard part has been understanding and modeling the change back from a toroidal field to a poloidal field. Most solar dynamo models rely on small-scale convective turbulence to do the job, but that would require a relatively weak magnetic field in the solar interior, contrary to observational evidence. Also, with these models, a stronger solar cycle takes longer to dissipate and a weaker one is over sooner—the opposite of reality.

Another type of model, the Babcock-Leighton model, uses a different mechanism. Magnetic fields released by decaying sunspots around the equator are carried poleward by north-south (meridional) plasma flows, and thence to the solar interior. Babcock-Leighton models were developed in the 1960s but, with little observational evidence to back them up, fell into neglect.

Helioseismology—the new science that studies the solar interior by way of acoustic oscillations observed on the surface—has changed that. "Now explanations for what is happening in the sun are constrained by reality," says Charbonneau. "It turns out that things we thought happened only on the surface happen well into the sun."

Charbonneau and Dikpati constructed a new Babcock-Leighton model with realistic fluid flows from helioseismology data. The model could reproduce many observed features of the solar cycle, such as the movement of sunspot emergence from higher to lower latitudes and the polarity flips. Furthermore, it could reproduce the observed phase relationship between the poloidal and toroidal magnetic components. "So that was very encouraging," says Charbonneau.

The HAO researchers then turned to the problem of reproducing the variable solar cycle. Although meridional flows carry large amounts of magnetic fields over time, they are quite weak, so they can be easily disrupted by the intense turbulent motions within the sun's convective envelope. To model this disruption, Dikpati and Charbonneau introduced random fluctuations into their meridional flows. These fluctuations caused the modeled solar- cycle lengths to vary from about 9 to 14 years—the same time span that has been observed in the sun over the centuries.

The average rate at which magnetic fields are transported poleward by the plasma flows is about the same in each solar cycle, no matter how large or small the modeled fluctuations are. Thus, when the flows are disrupted more than usual, the cycle lasts longer but is weaker, and conversely less disruption means a shorter, stronger cycle. Although the largest fluctuations suppress or amplify the transport process for a while, it returns to its average rate within a few cycles, just as the sun does.

Charbonneau and Dikpati have presented their results at conferences "and have always had a lot of interest," Charbonneau says. "We expect that because of our work, and that of Bernard Durney (University of Arizona) and the team at [the Naval Research Laboratory], more people will be using these models."


In this issue... Other issues of UCAR Quarterly
UCARNCARUOP

Edited by Carol Rasmussen, carolr@ucar.edu
Prepared for the Web by Jacque Marshall
Last revised: Wed Dec 13 17:24:16 MST 2000