![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
A
new kind of library:
|
||||||
![]() |
Leaders in digital libraries: (left to right) UCAR's Mary Marlino, David Fulker, and Kaye Howe.
|
||||||
"The vision of the geoscience education community was the driver for this effort," says Mary Marlino, director of the Digital Library for Earth System Education Program Center, housed at UCAR. Over the past three years, DLESE has pulled together a wide-ranging array of software experts, instructional designers, librarians, and other specialists. |
|||||||
|
The program center houses 18 staff, but in line with DLESEs distributed-development approach, many others are at work at K12 schools and universities nationwide. The Boulder-based staff serve as facilitatorsproviding the technical infrastructure, support, and continuity so that science teachers and other users can evaluate and annotate materials in the ways most useful to them. Over the past several years, says Marlino, "we have developed a community-based digital library that is being used by thousands of educators and learners every month." Critical to this effort, she adds, has been "an extraordinary level of community involvement in all aspects of library building." As of mid-2002, DLESE was providing access to more than 2,000 user- contributed resources, ranging from a single Web page to sites with hundreds of pages. Each resource stays at the location where it was created. Through DLESE, users can get to each resource through a simple but powerful search engine (one that wont take you to a hockey team if you type "avalanche"). The resources are identified by audience, resource type, discipline, and other variables. What distinguishes DLESE from related efforts (many of them research-based) is its participatory community. Dozens of universities take part in annual meetings and other activities, all guided by a user-driven strategic plan. Collaborating partners, working groups, standing committees, and a steering committee are all stakeholders in the development processa nationwide community of educators engaged in what Marlino calls "digital library activism." Constituents are now working with the DLESE Program Center on the next phases of the library. Enhancements will include the ability to search by national education standards for science and by geographic location; evaluations and reviews submitted by community members; an emphasis on the use of data in educational settings; and, at the center of it all, ever-growing, high-quality collections. The overall goal, as stated in the DLESE Community Plan, is to make the online library "the resource of first choice for anyone interested in learning about the Earth."
| ||||
![]() Stephen Collector
| |||||
A global-scale reading room Next door to the DLESE program center in Boulder, a different yet complementary approach is taking shape at the National Science Digital Library (NSDL). With a mission encompassing the full range of science, engineering, and related activities, NSDL may become one of the worlds largest digital libraries of its type by the end of the decade. If DLESE is the rough equivalent of a specialized, community-based library, offering hand-picked materials with employee and patron recommendations, then NSDL is more akin to a vast, eclectic main branch. NSDLs goal is inclusiveness: if an item is online and its related to science, it will likely have a place in the holdings. "Well rely on our partners, like DLESE, to vet their specialized collections," says Kaye Howe. Howea former college president, university vice chancellor, and professor of comparative literatureis now deputy director of the NSDL "core integration" office in Boulder. Howes office is charged with constructing the software and hardware that will pull this national library together. Other major partners in this $100 million NSF-funded project include Cornell University and Compaq Computer, which are overseeing the librarys catalog and its multifaceted entry portals, and Columbia University, where fiscal and intellectual-property issues are being handled.
| |||||
![]() |
| ||||
Diane Hillmann, a librarian at Cornell, where the seeds of NSDL were first sown, has worked with electronic cataloguing since the 1970s. Whats different today, she says, is that computer scientists and librarians are learning together how to "scale up" to handle online collections that grow far more rapidly than hard-copy stacks ever could. "Were trying to apply a lot of the digital library research of the last decade or so. You dont always need the most sophisticated technology. The initial goal is providing a large data base and making it work for the users." |
|||||
|
NSDLs tools will be among the best. Experts at the University of MassachusettsAmherst are building advanced search methods to help users zero in on the content they need. The library will also make it easy to build customized portals. For example, a teacher might combine astronomy and mathematics resources into a focused yet extensive home page from which her students could find source material for term projects without trawling the entire Web. As it gathers material, NSDL is following the model of the traditional library rather than that of peer-reviewed journals. While individual collections may be reviewed, with annotation helping to guide users, "NSDL reflects the open intellectual commons of the academic library," according to Howe. Financing a 21st-century library The effects of DLESE, NSDL, and other digital libraries on the business side of scholarly publishing are only beginning to take shape. "Many groups have developed their [digital] resources at lower cost than is possible in a traditional publishing model," says Kate Wittenberg (Columbia), who is monitoring the world of "transformational publishing" for NSDL and other digital libraries. Increasingly, users might pay for publications indirectlythrough fees for digital accessrather than buying hard copies directly. As for NSDL, some costs may be shifted to user institutions as the current funding winds down in 2006. The NSDL principals were working at full throttle during 2002 to produce the librarys initial release by years end. In the drivers seat were some of the worlds leading thinkers on how to move scientific resources on line. Among them are Cornell computer scientist William Arms, author of the 2001 overview Digital Libraries. In it, he envisions the hope of digital libraries that combine "everything that we most prize about traditional methods with the best that online information can offer. In some nightmares, the worst aspects of each are combined." However the digital future unfolds, surprises are bound to arise as new resources emerge. "The forms they will take," says Arms, "are almost impossible to anticipate." | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||